This head-to-head comparison is by Jeff from TodaysCraftsmen.
He put two 10″ ATBR combination blades through a series of real-world shop tests to see if spending more truly makes a difference.
Instead of relying on marketing specs or lab measurements, Jeff focused on everyday shop performance: ripping hardwoods, cross-cutting plywood, cutting melamine, and even rabbeting.
The goal? To find out what matters most—cost, quality, or longevity.
Watch the full video and subscribe to Jeff and Jon’s channel:
Why Blade Choice Matters
Table saw blades are among the most frequently replaced tools in a woodworking shop. A good combination blade stays on the saw for everything from ripping to cross-cutting, so choosing the right one can save time, effort, and money.
In this test, Jeff compared a low-cost blade commonly found at big box stores with a higher-end premium blade featuring a thicker plate and larger carbide tips.
Both use the same general tooth pattern—alternate top bevel with a raker (ATBR)—to allow versatility between rip and cross cuts.
Testing Conditions
To keep the comparison fair, both blades were new and tested under identical conditions. Each was installed separately on the same saw and run through the same five tasks:
- Ripping a burn-prone wood
- Ripping a dense hardwood
- Rip and cross-cutting plywood
- Cutting melamine
- Cutting rabbets to test raker performance
The focus wasn’t on precision measurement. Instead, Jeff evaluated ease of feed, quality of cut, visible tear-out, burn marks, and how each blade handled corners and transitions during more demanding cuts.
Ripping Burn-Prone Wood
Both blades performed reasonably well on this task. The budget blade showed minor scorch marks at the beginning of one cut, while the premium blade left a cleaner edge overall.
For general-purpose use, the difference was small—but visible. If you’re concerned with flawless rip edges without burn marks, the premium blade does offer a slight advantage.
Ripping Dense Hardwood
Here’s where things really started to diverge. The premium blade cut through the hardwood more smoothly and required noticeably less feed pressure.
It also left behind a cleaner cut face with fewer saw marks and reduced edge tear.
The budget blade was still serviceable, but the difference in effort and finish quality was clear. For repeat cuts in hardwoods, the upgrade made a real difference in user comfort and output.
Plywood Performance
Both blades ripped and cross-cut prefinished plywood with minimal tear-out, thanks in part to being new and sharp. There was no major difference in edge quality here.
Any small areas of chipping were likely due to veneer variations rather than blade geometry. For most woodworking applications, either blade would be acceptable on plywood in this condition.
Cutting Melamine
Melamine exposes blade flaws quickly, as white surfaces highlight every chip. In this test, both blades showed minor backside chipping, with the premium blade offering only a marginal improvement.
If you’re doing a lot of melamine work, Jeff suggests a specialty blade or a scoring setup. That said, both blades performed better than expected, showing how far even budget blades have come in edge quality.
Rabbet Quality and Raker Tooth
Rabbets put the raker tooth to the test. The budget blade left a flat but slightly striated bottom surface. The premium blade’s rabbet had a cleaner, crisper corner and a flatter floor.
The ATBR tooth profile leaves some fine marks regardless of blade, but the premium blade’s thicker plate and sharper raker edge made a difference here—especially for joinery that needs to be tight and square.
Durability and Sharpening Potential
One of the biggest value factors with blades is how many times they can be sharpened before replacement.
The premium blade had visibly larger carbide tips and a slightly thicker plate.
This means it can be re-sharpened several times without affecting performance, extending its usable life considerably. The budget blade’s smaller carbide tips may only survive one sharpening before quality drops off.
For pros or frequent users, this makes the premium blade a smarter long-term investment—even if the upfront cost is higher.
Which Blade Should You Choose?
If you’re working mostly with softwoods or need an affordable option for light-duty tasks, the budget blade performs surprisingly well. It’s ideal for the occasional woodworker who prefers to replace rather than sharpen.
If you’re working with dense hardwoods, want smoother feed, or plan to sharpen your blade multiple times, the premium option clearly stands out. It delivers better performance in challenging materials and holds its edge longer.
Final Thoughts
Jeff’s test showed that both blades are capable tools for most shop needs. But when tested across multiple materials, the premium blade showed advantages in ease of use, cut quality, and long-term durability.
That said, it’s encouraging to see how well the budget blade held up—especially in plywood and melamine tests. For woodworkers watching their costs, it’s a solid short-term solution.
Please support Jeff and Jon by visiting their website: https://todayscraftsmen.com/.